On May 27, 2016 5:00 AM, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Send Openvas-discuss mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Openvas-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. openvas-check-setup says Manager not running (Michael Kriwonos)
>    2. Re: openvas-check-setup says Manager not running (Chris)
>    3. Re: Having a problem scanning services on nonstandard ports
>       (Allyn Baskerville)
>    4. Re: Having a problem scanning services on nonstandard ports
>       (Sebastien Aucouturier)
>    5. OpenVas Log (Ravi verma)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:24:58 +0000
> From: Michael Kriwonos <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]"
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Openvas-discuss] openvas-check-setup says Manager not
>         running
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cf44f19fed82e1408c722c5d20b3d0f31f08b...@vuex14mb2.vuad.villanova.edu>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I keep getting the message that the Manager is not running, but the
> openvasmd process is running.  I also cannot tell from operations in the
> GUI what, if any, effect this is having on operations.
> ERROR: OpenVAS Manager is NOT running!
> FIX: Start OpenVAS Manager (openvasmd).
>
> I do see in the following in the /var/log/openvas/openvasmd.log
> lib auth:   INFO:2016-05-26 13h14.09 utc:2370: Authentication
> configuration not found.
>
> Is this a false positive or am I missing something?
>
> Online I saw info related to running a -rebuild, but that did not seem to
> change anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Kriwonos
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> [VU05BLUE.png]
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160526/bc81a662/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 10977 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160526/bc81a662/attachment-0001.png
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: openvas-check-setup.log
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 7478 bytes
> Desc: openvas-check-setup.log
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160526/bc81a662/attachment-0001.obj
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:36:08 +0200
> From: Chris <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] openvas-check-setup says Manager not
>         running
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi,
>
> > openvas-check-setup 2.3.0
>
> please always use the recent version of openvas-check-setup which is
> currently 2.3.3 and available here:
>
> https://svn.wald.intevation.org/svn/openvas/trunk/tools/openvas-check-setup
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:17:55 +0000
> From: Allyn Baskerville <[email protected]>
> To: Sebastien Aucouturier <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]"
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Having a problem scanning services on
>         nonstandard ports
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cy1pr0201mb1084eaa1cbb3c223c046c640dc...@cy1pr0201mb1084.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes, the port list does contain this port. I just did a tcpdump on the
> host that was tested by the scanner, and the scanner pinged the host twice
> and then generated the 3-way handshake to the obscure port, and then reset
> the connection. There was no more traffic, and the scan was done. The
> scanner performed no tests on this system. Here is the report results:
>
>
>
> 0 results
>
> Empty reports can happen for the following reasons:
>
> *       The target hosts where regarded dead.
> *       The filter does not match any result.
> *       A very small or non-verbose scan configuration was applied.
>
>  <
> https://172.31.1.101:9392/omp?cmd=get_report_section&report_id=36b78077-58af-4d02-83a4-54b079556b69&report_section=hosts&result_hosts_only=0&token=923d481f-dca8-42c8-896d-5783c3e6122f
> >
>
>  <
> https://172.31.1.101:9392/omp?cmd=get_report_section&report_id=36b78077-58af-4d02-83a4-54b079556b69&report_section=hosts&result_hosts_only=0&token=923d481f-dca8-42c8-896d-5783c3e6122f>
> However, this report contains 1 host.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Openvas-discuss [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Sebastien Aucouturier
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:23 AM
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Having a problem scanning services on
> nonstandard ports
>
>
>
> When you create your target config ?
>
> do the port lists attach contains this uncommon ports ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sebastien Aucouturier , Chief R&D Officer and Senior Technologist,
>
>
>
>   <http://secludit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/logo.png>
>
>
>
> Amazon WS Solutions Provider :  <
> http://www.aws-partner-directory.com/PartnerDirectory/PartnerDetail?Name=SecludIT>
>
> http://www.aws-partner-directory.com/PartnerDirectory/PartnerDetail?Name=SecludIT
>
>
>
>
>
> Agence Toulouse
>
> GSM: 06.20.60.77.24
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Allyn Baskerville <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Having just setup OpenVAS, I test scanned the local machine, and a couple
> issues were noted. I tried to scan my server that is only listening on two
> obscure ports, and I setup a port list with only these two ports in it,
> bound it to a target (the IP of this host), and then I ran a ?full and
> fast? scan. The scan finishes very fast ? about 2 minutes, and the report
> comes back with no open ports, the severity shows N/A, the report shows ?0
> results?, but it does show ?However, this report contains 1 host.? I?m not
> sure if nmap could be a problem, since running ./openvas-check-setup yield
> the following:
>
>
>
>         WARNING: Your version of nmap is not fully supported: 6.47
>
>         SUGGEST: You should install nmap 5.51 if you plan to use the nmap
> NSE NVTs.
>
>
>
> I?ve seen various posts commenting on this, but I?ve not found a
> resolution. Can anyone throw some ideas at me as to what I might try? Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openvas-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160526/4941419b/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: smime.p7s
> Type: application/pkcs7-signature
> Size: 4827 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160526/4941419b/attachment-0001.bin
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:31:04 +0200
> From: Sebastien Aucouturier <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]"
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Having a problem scanning services on
>         nonstandard ports
> Message-ID:
>         <CAGvXE3ZujgzgKZWt3dRv6iLq=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Enable the log_whole_attack  preferences in the config file,
> perhaps we may find an answer in openvassd.message log file.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Allyn Baskerville <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, the port list does contain this port. I just did a tcpdump on the
> > host that was tested by the scanner, and the scanner pinged the host
> twice
> > and then generated the 3-way handshake to the obscure port, and then
> reset
> > the connection. There was no more traffic, and the scan was done. The
> > scanner performed no tests on this system. Here is the report results:
> >
> >
> >
> > 0 results
> >
> > Empty reports can happen for the following reasons:
> >
> >    - The target hosts where regarded dead.
> >    - The filter does not match any result.
> >    - A very small or non-verbose scan configuration was applied.
> >
> >
> > <
> https://172.31.1.101:9392/omp?cmd=get_report_section&report_id=36b78077-58af-4d02-83a4-54b079556b69&report_section=hosts&result_hosts_only=0&token=923d481f-dca8-42c8-896d-5783c3e6122f
> >
> >
> > However, this report contains 1 host.
> > <
> https://172.31.1.101:9392/omp?cmd=get_report_section&report_id=36b78077-58af-4d02-83a4-54b079556b69&report_section=hosts&result_hosts_only=0&token=923d481f-dca8-42c8-896d-5783c3e6122f
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Openvas-discuss [mailto:
> > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sebastien
> > Aucouturier
> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:23 AM
> > *Cc:* [email protected]
> > *Subject:* Re: [Openvas-discuss] Having a problem scanning services on
> > nonstandard ports
> >
> >
> >
> > When you create your target config ?
> >
> > do the port lists attach contains this uncommon ports ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Allyn Baskerville <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Having just setup OpenVAS, I test scanned the local machine, and a couple
> > issues were noted. I tried to scan my server that is only listening on
> two
> > obscure ports, and I setup a port list with only these two ports in it,
> > bound it to a target (the IP of this host), and then I ran a ?full and
> > fast? scan. The scan finishes very fast ? about 2 minutes, and the report
> > comes back with no open ports, the severity shows N/A, the report shows
> ?0
> > results?, but it does show ?However, this report contains 1 host.? I?m
> not
> > sure if nmap could be a problem, since running ./openvas-check-setup
> yield
> > the following:
> >
> >
> >
> >         WARNING: Your version of nmap is not fully supported: 6.47
> >
> >         SUGGEST: You should install nmap 5.51 if you plan to use the nmap
> > NSE NVTs.
> >
> >
> >
> > I?ve seen various posts commenting on this, but I?ve not found a
> > resolution. Can anyone throw some ideas at me as to what I might try?
> Thanks
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openvas-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160527/0d42a886/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:19:27 +0530
> From: Ravi verma <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Openvas-discuss] OpenVas Log
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cagajnw1epbtn2olk_cim5vynkt3od0us2l6gg0e7knpm2jl...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I have installed Openvas on Redhat 6.5 x86_64, But I am not able to scan
> Host properly and also Vulnerability infect Item not showing in Openvas
> generated report.
>
> I am attaching openvas check status log, Kindly check and revert.
>
>
> --
>
> *Thanks & Regards*
>
> *Ravi Verma*
>
> *IT-Help desk*
>
> *LN M-IIT *
> *Jaipur -302031*
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160527/e1b7d486/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: openvas-check-setup.log
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 8022 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20160527/e1b7d486/attachment-0001.obj
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openvas-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Openvas-discuss Digest, Vol 112, Issue 21
> ************************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to