I just got an answer to this question from a salesperson working at Greenbone. The OpenVAS-reports and the Greenbone-reports have indeed the same structure. So if you are using a parser which works on OpenVAS-reports, it will also work on the reports generated by the Greenbone appliance. The only differences are - as the salesperson put it - in quality. But this is something you should evaluate yourself, as I am in no position to justify this claim. Am 12.12.2016 4:32 nachm. schrieb "Eero Volotinen" <[email protected]>:
> Hi, > > I don't have access to greenbone appliance, but I assume they both support > same reports. GreenBone supports a bit more, but that is not a issue? > > -- > Eero > > 2016-12-12 15:27 GMT+02:00 Dasist Einname <[email protected]>: > >> Hello list, >> >> This is a cross posting from the Information Security StackExchange-Site, >> so far I couldn't find anything prohibiting this. My apologies if it does. >> >> My company is planning to use a Greenbone appliance in the near future >> and wants to analyze the results with another tool. I have access to >> OpenVAS with GSA so I am able to test analysis now with existing scans, but >> I'm not sure, if I can use my tool for analysis, as soon I have only access >> to the scans from my Greenbone appliance. >> >> This leads to the question: Do the Greenbone reports actually differ from >> a typical OpenVAS scan report? >> >> >> >> Thanks for your help in advance. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openvas-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/o >> penvas-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
