OpenVAS users,

I have been messing with PostgreSQL tuning (http://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/) 
because some of my colleagues are complaining that its slow.
Of course they are a bit impatient and it's all workable for the one time a 
month they look at things... but still, I wonder if I can improve something.

My question to all of you, what are your load times?
Mine:

*         Tasks overview (no widgets), 244 in total showing 10 on the page 
takes about 4 seconds.

Showing reports loading times varies strongly of course based on the amount of 
reports and results.
As an administrator, a particular report takes 3 seconds to load but takes 
double that for a 'normal' user.
Both users see the exact same data. The only difference is that the 
administrator may freely see all and any data in the system while the regular 
user
Is limited in the amount of tasks he may see. While they both may see this 
particular task and report the loading time is much higher for the regular user.

Everything is clearly a lot faster in response for me as administrator, that is 
a bit frustrating to me and for my colleagues.


*         Is this normal?

*         Is this just me? (running on a vmware machine with an Intel(R) 
Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz; VM has 4 cores with 4gb ram, Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 
and postgresql 9.5 database size of 600mb; only see 100% cpu core usage per 
SELECT thread without IO waits or anything else blocking/halting/being in the 
way)



Thijs Stuurman
Security Operations Center | KPN Internedservices
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
T: +31(0)299476185 | M: +31(0)624366778
PGP Key-ID: 0x16ADC048 (https://pgp.surfnet.nl/)
Fingerprint: 2EDB 9B42 D6E8 7D4B 6E02 8BE5 6D46 8007 16AD C048

W: https://www.internedservices.nl<https://www.internedservices.nl/> | L: 
http://nl.linkedin.com/in/thijsstuurman

_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to