Hi, is a laptop, not a server so port 80 is not going to be open inbound. Does this mean that this way the vulnerability cannot be detected from OpenVAS?
Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Openvas-discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 05 December 2017 11:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Openvas-discuss Digest, Vol 131, Issue 1 Send Openvas-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Openvas-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Size of /var/lib/openvas/mgr (Romain Fritz) 2. INTEL-SA-00086 not detected (OpenVAS User) 3. Re: INTEL-SA-00086 not detected (Antu Sanadi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:04:56 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Fritz <[email protected]> To: Christian Fischer <[email protected]> Cc: openvas-discuss <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Size of /var/lib/openvas/mgr Message-ID: <1861317840.5678320.1512403496189.javamail.zim...@lyra-network.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, I've tried thzese optimisation but without any success. But I remove tasks.db files and launch a new openvas-setup and it solve my problem without any issues. Romain FRITZ LYRA NETWORK Ingenieur Exploitation / Service exploitation Tel: +33 5 32 09 09 79 | Desk: 579 [ mailto:[email protected] | [email protected] ] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Fischer" <[email protected]> To: "Romain Fritz" <[email protected]> Cc: "openvas-discuss" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 6:44:15 PM Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Size of /var/lib/openvas/mgr Hi, On 16.11.2017 09:28, Romain Fritz wrote: > In this folder there is a tasks.db file (I assume it's a database) is > it possible to purge this database in order to have almost the same > size as the master ? have a look at the help output of openvasmd (openvasmd --help) which provides the following commands: --optimize=<name> Run an optimization: vacuum, analyze, cleanup-config-prefs, remove-open-port-results, cleanup-port-names, cleanup-result-severities, cleanup-schedule-times, rebuild-report-cache or update-report-cache. vacuum and/or analyze might be the commands you're looking for. Regards, -- Christian Fischer | PGP Key: 0x54F3CE5B76C597AD Greenbone Networks GmbH | http://greenbone.net Neumarkt 12, 49074 Osnabr?ck, Germany | AG Osnabr?ck, HR B 202460 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:21:53 -0500 From: OpenVAS User <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [Openvas-discuss] INTEL-SA-00086 not detected Message-ID: <oSIElpd1eqCSWlrVcTyKNDUZYlb4Rb3ITvGtyi7BMLG56gsSQyH2A8TWqpSuhXPFR5lkieIwcTNDIbBe_OMoC_j6Gk24K2DKWN_2tGVcrHg=@protonmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, I am trying to scan a Windows host that I know is vulnerable to INTEL-SA-00086 I saw this so I believe that the scan should give positive results: https://vulners.com/openvas/OPENVAS:1361412562310812221 However, despite I am running the latest NVTs, I don't see the vulnerability trigger. Any idea why? Thanks in advance. Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20171204/a5610bd7/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:43:51 +0530 From: Antu Sanadi <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] INTEL-SA-00086 not detected Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Hello, Its a remote detection, Please make sure server is listening ("Server: Intel(R) Con. Management Engine") on HTTP port. Thanks, Antu Sanadi On Monday 04 December 2017 10:51 PM, OpenVAS User wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to scan a Windows host that I know is vulnerable to > *INTEL-SA-00086* > I saw this so I believe that the scan should give positive results: > https://vulners.com/openvas/OPENVAS:1361412562310812221 > However, despite I am running the latest NVTs, I don't see the > vulnerability trigger. > Any idea why? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-dis > cuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/attachments/20171205/752f4396/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss ------------------------------ End of Openvas-discuss Digest, Vol 131, Issue 1 ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
