On Wednesday 30 September 2009 15:44:37 Michael Meyer wrote:
> *** Felix Wolfsteller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I propose that we antiquate manual version numbering for NVTs that are in
> > the repository.
> >
> > Imho the solution is simple:
> >
> > instead of a
> > 'script_version ("1.2.0-patch2");'
> > one can use
> > 'script_version ("$Revision");'
>
> It has to be 'script_version ("$Revision$");'
Oh yeah, thats correct.
> > Then, by calling
> > 'svn propset svn:keywords "Revision" '
>
> To automate this:
>
> ,---[ ~/.subversion/config ]
>
> | [miscellany]
> | enable-auto-props = yes
> |
> | [auto-props]
> | *.nasl = svn:keywords=Id Revision;
>
> `---|
>
> > Opinions?
I would go for it, but would like to hear more opinions.
Also, in my eyes nothing speaks against a mixed approach as proposed by
Christian Eric (e.g. script_version ("1.0-$Revision$"); ).
-- felix
--
Felix Wolfsteller | ++49 541 335083-783 | http://www.intevation.de/
PGP Key: 39DE0100
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
