HI Thomas, Please find inline comment.
Thomas Reinke wrote: > Hmm...I agree there's an issue, but I'm not sure if I agree with you on > the details (but can be arm twisted on this - have not made up my mind). > > Having an up to date kernel installed on the system does not > imply that the up to date kernel is the one running. > What if a a new kernel was installed, but the system never > rebooted? I don't know that this should be quietly ignored. > > I suppose we could go for the default "normal" case, and > simply ignore generating a warning providing that the > up to date (or later) kernel is available. How often > I guess it boils down to whether or not we consider the > lack of a reboot to be something to worry about from an > audit perspective. If not, then likely a simple update to > how we check for multiple versions of the same package > being installed would be in order. As you mentioned above a simple update will do. > Thomas > > Thank you, Veerendra GG _______________________________________________ Openvas-plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
