would also be interesting to see comparision of false-positive/false-negative rate in your scans. I.e. out of 35/50 vulnerabilities - how many of these were false alarms?
2011/11/8 Sébastien AUCOUTURIER <[email protected]> > Hi friends, > i promised weeks ago to give results of a compare nessus /ovas > i run a test against a Win Server unpatch ... giving admin credentials > to both nessus/openvas > > - homefeed nessus plugins were used, and openvas full ultimate and very > deep plugins ones. > i do not check if they were some false positive. > > here is my count ; > Vulnerabilities detect by both (with same cvss score assign) : 104 > Vulnerabilities detect by both (with NOT the same cvss score assign ) : 67 > Vulnerabilities only detect by nessus : 45 > Vulnerabilities only detect by openvas : 50 > > to my mind the vulns only detect by openvas are also detect by nessus > but with the PRO-Feed License. > > i am very happy with OPENVAS Result !!!, > just a litle bit suprise to see different CVSS score for a same > vulnerability. > who s wrong who s right i do not dig in ... > > -- > | Sébastien AUCOUTURIER | Software Design Engineer Lead | > | ITrust | 55 rue l'Occitane BP 67303 31673 LABEGE CEDEX > | Email: [email protected] | Fixe Sdt. 05.67.34.67.80 | Fax. > 09.80.08.37.23 > | IT Security Services & SaaS Editor | > > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-plugins mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins >
_______________________________________________ Openvas-plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
