On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 09:18, James Yonan wrote: > Hello Pat, > > I think it's a good idea, something we're considering for the next release.
I would like to have some info then on how to stop accepting a certain client certificate, since I base my "expirations" on stopping the port in question in case I no longer want a specific certificate to be able to connect to the network. I mean, of course the one-port-per-person will work after such an addition, but for folks that get in later. > > Hi, > > > > I would like to use openvpn to secure nfs on my network. However, as it is > > strictly peer to peer I would have to specify an udp port for every > > client-server nfs relationships. I would have liked to avoid that. Thus I > > though it could be a nice addition to openvpn if it ws possible to settle > > it as a server, which forks for any childs. > > > > Does it conflicts with the design of openvpn, or could it accepted as a > > feature ? -- Jan Johansson (jan.johans...@biomatsys.com) BioMat System AB Klarabergsgatan 37, III SE-111 21 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46-(0)8-233500, Fax: +46-(0)70-3873952 THIS COMMUNICATION IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL, OR ENTITY, TO WHICH IT IS DIRECTED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF RECEIVED IN ERROR: PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY THROUGH i...@biomatsys.com.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
