On Tue, 02 Jul 2002, James Yonan wrote:

> Here are some answers that come to mind:
> 
> (1) Accumulate such patches and merge them all at once in a future release
> such as 1.3.0 or 2.0.0, while warning users that this release will not be
> backward compatible.

That's the way to go. Anything else adds too much complexity.

-- 
Matthias Andree

Attachment: pgpeQ6M1nzUJe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to