On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > Hi, > > It seems [1] that specifying mssfix without a value, like the man page > suggests [2], gives a fatal (Options) error now. Is this a new expected > behaviour (that should be updated in the man page), or something not > wanted?
It looks like since very early 2.0 releases, the ability to specify mssfix without a parameter, and then have it inherit the fragment parameter value was lost. I know that 1.6 did this -- though with mssfix becoming the default in 2.0, some of the finer details of the 1.6 semantics seems to have been lost. I will try to fix this for beta18. James
