On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, JuanJo Ciarlante wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:28:18AM -0600, James Yonan wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, JuanJo Ciarlante wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:35:36PM -0600, James Yonan wrote: > > > > I'm happy to announce that OpenVPN 2.0 has been released! > > > > > > > > http://openvpn.net/download.html > > > > > > > > Thanks to all who have supported the project with donations, developing > > > > code, writing articles, and helping to support people on the mailing > > > > lists. > > > > > > > > I'm going to sit back now, relax, maybe try to get my server > > > > slashdotted, > > > > and I'll try not to think too much about OpenVPN 3.0 until the middle > > > > of > > > > the week :) > > > > > > Congratulations for the great work!, openvpn-2 rocks. > > > > > > BTW I've finished my UDPv6 "port" for openvpn-2.0-final, I'll announce > > > the details > > > ASAP. > > > > Excellent -- I'm glad you've been keeping the patch in sync. > > Yep; fortunately there are several ppl using it, they feedback'd several > fixes (the > latest one related to FreeBSD compilation and semantics).
I would like to merge your IPv6 patch into the 2.1 branch, once it gets started (I'd like to keep the 2.0.x branch as stable as possible, with minimalistic changes that don't go beyond bug fixes and small patches). One potential speed bump will be in merging both IPv6 + the multihomed patch which will definitely be going into 2.1: http://openvpn.net/patch/openvpn-2.0_rc16MH.patch Because both patches touch much of the same code, there will likely be a need for manual merging. There's also a new CVS branch where I've been working on pthread support (see the BETA20-THREAD branch in the cvs). The multihomed code has not been merged into this branch yet (though it's a clean merge with no conflicts). James
