On Monday 25 April 2005 17:30, Vladimir S. Petukhov wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 10:19, you wrote: > > On Monday 25 April 2005 16:54, Vladimir S. Petukhov wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Sorry for my English... > > > > > > I have next task: > > > We have client and provider with 2 channel (land & satellite) between > > > them: for in/outgoing traffic. Client and server have a soft, implemented > > > as local http-proxy. Server proxy made real http-request. Between client > > > and server all data must be compressed and encapsulated in udp packets. > > > > > > > > > <----compressed udp channel (satellite)-- > > > Client | "proxy" --- compressed udp channel (land) -> "proxy" | > > > server > > > > > > The main goal - compression (HTTP - 70-90%). > > > > > > Can anybody advice usefull soft or any decisions? > > > > Well, openvpn will do this. > > hardly... > OpenVPN - is a tunnel and not support two separated channels...
Use policy routing + TWO openvpn tunnels. > And compression may not be good (not a main goal of openVPN)... What do you mean 'may not'? I thought you already tested at least that before asking questions... -- vda
