On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Simon Perreault wrote: > You haven't explained why my statement ".so's are only included in > -devel packages because their only use is when linking" is false. I > have agreed with everything you have written, and I seem to be missing > that critical part. You have even provided an example where libfoo.so > is in the -devel rpm, just as I said.
Sorry. I totally misread the problem that was discussed, and your assertions. -- Matthias Andree
