Thanks David. Your inputs are of great help.
Thanks,
Keyur
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, David Sommerseth <openvpn.l...@topphemmelig.net> wrote:
> From: David Sommerseth <openvpn.l...@topphemmelig.net>
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] [Openvpn-devel] Availability of GA Load for 2.1
> series
> To: keyurpuj...@yahoo.co.in
> Cc: openvpn-us...@lists.sourceforge.net, openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Saturday, December 6, 2008, 2:02 PM
> Keyur Pujara wrote:
> >> Which release candidate of 2.1 series is
> recommended for
> >> "Production Use"?
> >>
> >> Cross-Posting on Development mailing-list:
> Requesting
> >> comment on this aspect and a visibility on planned
> GA date
> >> for 2.1 series if any.
> >
> >
> > Would help if someone could reply/share their
> experience with 2.1 series on above perspective. Also - any
> comment on planned GA date for 2.1 series.
>
> I've been running OpenVPN 2.1 RC 11, 13 and 15 stable
> in production environment since June. I have
> not had any particular issues. The site is not extremely
> hard tested, but stability is present. I
> did some long-term testing on RC 11, with TLS keys being
> renewed every 10 minutes and had the
> session open for about 50 hours. The connections was rock
> solid, even though a little bit slower
> due to the very frequent key renewal.
>
> In this setup, I'm using dev-type tap, UDP, LZO, TLS
> (server/client), ifconfig-pool,
> client-config-dir, client-to-client, persist-{key,tun},
> AES-CBC cipher, chroot, management, running
> as non-root user and the plugin option. The plugin being
> used is my own authentication plugin
> (http://www.eurephia.net)
>
> During this long run, I also did not notice any obvious
> memory leaks. It simply felt rock solid.
>
> I hope this was helpful for you (or others). Regarding GA
> date, I'm also waiting for this date.
>
>
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth
