Hi,
This is more my bet, because my question wasn't very clear ... I require a proxy server during "normal" operation, but for this data throughput test I had no proxy server, rather a "direct" connection. Thoughts? Thanks! On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 09:31 AM, "Karl O. Pinc" <k...@meme.com> wrote: > On 03/03/2010 02:40:16 AM, Jason Haar wrote: > > On 03/03/2010 04:52 PM, open...@rkmorris.us wrote: > > > > > > 1) Without OpenVPN - consistent performance, ~ 70 Mbps total > > > throughput (on a 100 Mb LAN). > > > > 2) With OpenVPN - very consistent performance, sometimes fine, > > other > > > times very poor. ~ 70 Mbps total throughput (on a 100 Mb LAN), but > > > bounces around a lot. > > > So what you're saying is that on a ~70Mbs network you sometimes see > > ~70Mbs via "openvpn-via-proxy-server" and sometimes you don't? As the > > performance of openvpn varies - and I assume you know the client and > > server aren't the bottleneck - then that leaves....? > > > > The proxy! :-) > > Or problems with tunneling tcp inside tcp which you can trace > back via this thread: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.user/29183 > > > > Karl <k...@meme.com> > Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." > -- Robert A. Heinlein > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel >
