Hi,
I just tried this, and at least for my data throughput test it didn't seem to help ... buy maybe I have this wrong. I did this in the client configuration file ... is this right? I checked the OpenVPN web site, and it may be that I need this on the server side instead. Please clarify and I'll try it again (if I need to). Thanks! On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 03:35 PM, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:28:48PM +0100, booyakasha wrote: > > magic number 2952 (ping ?l 2952). It wasn?t only the 1472 ping > > packet which worked OK. All packets over 2952 are OK !!! I am > > waiting for your opinions why packets from 1 byte to 2952 bytes > > (without 1472 byes package) are going extremely slowly and others not. > > TCP_NODELAY > > David has already suggested that you should try setting > > "socket-flags TCP_NODELAY" > > - did you? > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //http://www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de > fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel >
