Cool, thanks for the clarifications. Will investigate into it.
Vineet
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Karl O. Pinc <k...@meme.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/2010 04:22:53 PM, Vineet Kumar wrote:
>> Sorry pl. explain the "intermediary" part. Is that supposed to solve
>> the single telnet server accepting multiple *concurrent* client
>> sessions?
>
> Yes. The multiple concurrent client sessions talk to a single
> telnet server via an intermediary. The intermediary serializes
> the requests made by the multiple concurrent sessions and feeds
> the resulting stream to the single telnet session.
>
> A simpleminded way to do this might be to dump the requests
> into files in a directory that's monitored by incron, which
> then feeds the commands to, say, socat or nc (netcat).
> (Incron is a nice intermediary because it isolates the
> requests -- they can be monitored for correctness etc.)
> I've no idea if this is the right approach for your application.
>
>
>
> Karl <k...@meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
>
