This is my last reply on this thread.
What I show you is that without any change I compile static code for
arm using cross compiler.
I guess I am far more knowledgeable than you to tell me what is right,
and I disapprove your comments and language.

So the answer to your initial question: yes, openvpn can be compiled statically.
Figure it out your-self.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Mr Dash Four
<mr.dash.f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-objdump:
>> image-arm-static/openvpn/sbin/openvpn: Invalid operation
>>
>
> Huh?
>
> Have you altered the sources/makefiles of openvpn or any of the dependent
> libraries (lzo, openssh etc) by any chance? I noticed you are applying a
> single patch to the lzo source, which I had to re-adjust as I was using a
> newer version, but I am not aware of any alterations that you have made to
> these - if you have done so, please state what these alterations are?
>
> I don't know whether you've altered the original build script or not, but
> the end result, before applying my changes, clearly produces openvpn
> executable, which has external dependencies on all statically-produced .la
> files/libraries (lzo, openssh etc) - they are all packed in the .tar archive
> produced at the end of this script (located in the /lib directory to be more
> precise).
>
> I don't know what you are trying to prove by posting the above though - the
> final gcc linker call, which produces the openvpn executable before packing
> the image does *not* have any static-linking related options whatsoever! I
> could post the exact gcc command line, but I do not have access to that
> machine at present.
>
> These options are, as I already pointed out previously, "-static",
> "-static-gcc" as well as "-ldl" - the latter being a new dependencies,
> necessary to offset the fact that all dl* calls (dlopen etc) won't be
> satisfied if static linking is invoked, so this external library needs to be
> included so that static linking succeeds, otherwise you will get "unknown
> symbol" errors.
>
> Again, all that is provided you haven't altered any of the core source
> and/or makefile scripts in any way (I haven't used your own - alonbv - repos
> to download these, but downloaded these packages from their original source
> where these projects are created - openvpn.net, openssh.org etc). If you
> have made such alterations, I'd like to know what changes have you made?
>

Reply via email to