Hi, On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:31:56PM +0200, Adriaan de Jong wrote: > I don't see the need to further delay 2.3 for this, as it is not > a bug fix. Others might disagree here, and the topic is open for > debate :). In general, it might be a good idea to freeze development > of 2.3 at some point to prevent endless alpha syndrome.
I'm with Adriaan on this. I want 2.3 *out*, and *soon* - people are
waiting for an OpenVPN release with IPv6 support.
(There *is* lots of more work to be done, but there will always be a release
after 2.3 - and with more reasonable release cycles, 2.4 will be here
before we could otherwise reach a "everything in!" 2.3...)
I'm not commenting on the PolarSSL patches, because I don't feel confident
in ACKing or NACKing crypto stuff - "it looks reasonable to me", but that's
more a half-feature-ACK than anything else. But besides this, I think it's
time to tag -alpha2, give this a good beating, and then figure out what
we think is missing *and can be achieved in reasonable time* for 2.3-beta1.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpn2u7DepE8N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
