Hi, On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:01:55PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:43:12PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >> What I am asking is for people that wishes to work with me on this > >> (not the ACK/NACK approach) to allow perfecting this *BEFORE* merge. > > > > I would actually ask for "no more cleanup changes to tun.c before 2.3" - > > I have cleaned up and *tested* all non-Linux-platforms in the previous > > months and everything is working well now (not looking very pretty, I'm > > the first to agree on this), but *working* *now*. > > Did I wrote or implied that this is going to 2.3?
You asked for wishes :-) - and that's my wish: first focus on 2.3, and
then do the next round of C code cleanup.
[..]
> The IPv6 is one of the reason the code is so messy.
> Please help clean it up.
> For example, there is no reason not to use iovec in all cases as far
> as I understand.
I'm all willing to help clean up tun.c *and test the result on all
platforms* afterwards. I just do no thave the necessary amount of
available time (a few contiguous days without too much disturbance) right
now, and I know that this will not improve before August/September.
So right now, I can't work on tun.c at all, sorry.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpvQLHCKxxFf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
