Hi, On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 04:10:54PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >> And always have pam dependency for this example? > > > > FreeBSD, NetBSD, all Linuxes and Solaris have PAM anyway. > > > > So make this "if pam libraries + headers are detected, install auth-pam, > > otherwise, not". > > We already discussed the automatic detection and integrity failure as result.
Huh? You're the master of Autoconf, and I'm sure you will be able to
produce a working PAM detection for those platforms that have it.
> >> These plugins should be optional I don't see any value in enforcing
> >> them and their dependencies.
> >
> > If these plugins are useful for a large number of users, there is no
> > point in not installing them by default.
>
> They are not.
Unfounded claim.
> Exactly because the are not useful, I am for the split.
> Anyway, if you follow the apache example there is explicit
> enable/disable to each.
And there are some that are enabled by default. Your point?
> BTW: Packager of what platform are you?
openwrt. Not that this is of any relevance.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpvmW85gTbbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
