Hi, On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:08:11PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > I don't really care what the make target is called. It could even be an > entirely different target. Buildslaves could easily run "make check" > followed by "make root-check", "make connection-test" or whatever. If > nobody outside the core project is supposed to run the connectivity > tests, I think separating them from "make check" would make sense.
Nobody who hasn't set up a t_client.rc beforehand will be bothered by
the client connectivity tests anyway - "make check" will tell him
"rc file hasn't been set up, skipping test", and that's all of it.
So while I can see some purity of argument here - in the end, it's
wasting human life time on discussions again, and the time could be
better spent on what's sorely missing right now: automated tests
(unit tests, client system tests, server system tests).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpnm4m_DwVf5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
