Hi, On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:51:54AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > On 11/07/14 10:00, Philipp Hagemeister wrote: > >On modern systems, topology subnet should always be set, but it's > >missing in the configuration file. > >Add it with a short explanation. > NACK > There are a few annoying issues with > topology subnet > esp when using server side things like > route <remote subnet> <mask> > > that will *fail* with 'topology subnet' ; until this is fixed this > should NOT be considered the default.
Well, it's on the roadmap, and Arne has already sent a patch.
So, what other issues exist? This is the only one I'm aware of...
(and the recent trac ticket about "topology subnet not working on
FreeBSD 10" turned out to be local confusion...)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpQjI7P_2qaR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
