Hi, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > >AFAICT windows does support that option (that's what I was referring > >to with options 121 or 249) . OTOH, I am *not* sure if it allows you > >to set a 0.0.0.0/1 route using that option, but I guess there's only > >one way to find out. > > FWIW: I've patched openvpn to set routes using DHCP on Windows and yes, > it works: I can add any route to the system routing tables, including > 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.1/1 ; this could be used as an alternative to > requiring elevated privileges.
Unless you can also set the host route for the VPN gateway (point to
a gateway on a *different* interface), this is not really helping...
just adding 2x /1 will just cause recursion as packets to the VPN server
will be happily routed into the tap interface again.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpFknH1vqfBX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
