Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:04:25AM +0200, Jiri Horky wrote: > continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you > can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and > maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in function
I'm not sure if you've been following the list and/or git master
commits, but we have somehing in master for a while now...
commit fc91d4b0071178e298052078431fb86f03be84fc (master)
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue Jun 30 21:44:56 2015 +0200
Increase control channel packet size for faster handshakes
Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger <stef...@karger.me>
Acked-by: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>
Message-Id: <1435693496-10931-1-git-send-email-stef...@karger.me>
URL: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/9841
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>
... and as far as we can see, this "just works" (and OpenVPN 3 on iOS
and Android also uses larger packets for the control channel, so we're
just following suit here).
So, if you run git master, you already have it :-) - and if you run 2.3.x,
you can just cherry-pick the patch, it should apply easily.
(It will eventually hit 2.3.9 or 2.3.10, but I want to wait for a bit
more feedback from the "early testers")
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpg2yyO_5hpb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
