Travis CI supports Linux and MacOS X, no *BSD, no Windows, ...

2016-05-24 12:31 GMT+05:00 Steffan Karger <stef...@karger.me>:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net>
> wrote:
> > Yes. I think a separate testing branch with more liberal commit rights
> > combined with pulling from GitHub makes sense. I'm not sure what happens
> > at the buildslaves if we decide rewind history - rewinding would be
> > quite useful when working with pure testing branches in that we could
> > make "testing" track master and whenever a bad patch is found, simply
> > rewind back to the last known-good state.
>
> Isn't this what github pull requests + travis is supposed to give us?
> Of course, that currently only covers a rather small part (much less
> than the buildbot tests), but it's not that hard to expand that to at
> least a decent number of compile variations.  That would give us
> useful smoke tests before looking at a single line of code.
>
> (May I remind the list of
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/10865, which got
> some comments from ciphitsine (see
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/11557/focus=11585),
> but was never really ACK'ed and applied.)
>
> -Steffan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Openvpn-devel mailing list
> Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
>

Reply via email to