Anno domini 2017 Maximilian Wilhelm scripsit: Hi,
for the record: I've updated the PR on github and addressed the issues raised here before. -> https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/pull/65#issuecomment-330715591 The point remaining is the support for FreeBSD: [...] > > > + if (sock->bind_dev) > > > + { > > > +#if defined(TARGET_LINUX) > > > + setsockopt (sock->sd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE, sock->bind_dev, > > > strlen (sock->bind_dev) + 1); > > > +#elif defined(TARGET_FREEBSD) > > > + setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, IP_SENDIF, sock->bind_dev, strlen > > > (sock->bind_dev) + 1); > > > +#endif > > > + } [...] > > I cannot find that IP_SENDIF in any freebsd man page or /usr/include on > > a 10.3 system. I don't think this option exists. > > I just googled for this part as I don't have any BSD-ish machines > here. That part is purely theoretical, that's why I asked for testers :) > > If this turns out to be wrong I'd just remove this. My understanding > on what I found on the net was that this would have the same effect as > the Linux version so I considered it worth a try. As discussed within the PR, https://wiki.freebsd.org/Networking still references IP_SENDIF, so it seems to at least have existed some time in the past. Can anyone shed some more light on this part? Best Max -- "I have to admit I've always suspected that MTBWTF would be a more useful metric of real-world performance." -- Valdis Kletnieks on NANOG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
