Hi,

On 29/12/17 18:23, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 29-12-17 11:11, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>> thank for the patch.
>>
>> not directly related to the patch itself, but openvpn is shipped with
>> several memory debugging options
>>
>> --with-mem-check=TYPE   build with debug memory checking
>>
>>
>> should we get rid of them (in favour of sanitizers) ? or, maybe add to
>> tests instead ?
> 
> I've tried to use those in the past, but found them hard to use.  I
> think they're a remnant of the past.  I would personally prefer to get
> rid of them and use the (nowadays much better) fully external memory
> checking tools instead (sanitizers, valgrind, etc).

As Selva pointed out, we don't use --with-mem-check in any test,
therefore I am not even sure it still works as expected.

I am also in favour in of getting rid of our custom made check and use
compilers provided sanitizers instead (also gcc provides interesting
sanitizers, thus everybody should be bale to enable them).

Cheers,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to