Hi On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Emmanuel Deloget <log...@free.fr> wrote: > Of course, this one is not strictly needed. If you want to keep the function > around, feel free to ignore the patch. > > Given the relative simplicity of the change, one can also consider that if > the function is needed again we could simply revert this patch.
That's fine with me. My pending patches do not call this (at the expense of double EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA() calls first to dispatch and then to do the work) and I'm fine with it at the moment. Selva ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
