Hi, On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:41:01PM -0500, selva.n...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> > > - Increase the management version from 1 to 2 > - If the client announces support for management version > 1 > prompt for signature using >PK_SIGN to which the client > responds using 'pk-sig' > Older (current) clients will be continued to be prompted > by '>RSA_SIGN' and can respond using 'rsa-sig' > - Remove an unused rsa_sig buffer-list variable > > This facilitates a transparent transition to PK_SIG and future deprecation > of RSA_SIGN
I'm a bit confused about the sequence of patches here. Is this one dependent on one of the other PK_SIGN related patches? Or standalone and could be applied to master "as is"? gert -- now what should I write here... Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
