Hi,

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:47:27PM +0300, Lev Stipakov wrote:
> V2: style fixes
> 
> - print protocol, source/dest addresses and ports
> - mention "--allow-recursive-routing"
> - add possible usecase to manpage
> 
> Trac #843

I'm not sure I'm convinced.  This is quite a lot of extra code for
an "add a few extra fields to a warning" enhancement - especially
given that those that are already confused by the warning today 
will be more confused by "more numbers"...



> @@ -1094,7 +1099,7 @@ drop_if_recursive_routing(struct context *c, struct 
> buffer *buf)
>          const struct openvpn_iphdr *pip;
>  
>          /* make sure we got whole IP header */
> -        if (BLEN(buf) < ((int) sizeof(struct openvpn_iphdr) + ip_hdr_offset))
> +        if (BLEN(buf) < ((int)sizeof(struct openvpn_iphdr) + ip_hdr_offset))

In addition, these changes look funny.  The existing code style was produced
by the scripted big code cleanup for 2.4, so there should never be a
reason to change the style in a patch for "master".

gert
-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to