Hi, On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 12:02:44AM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > - Make sure v4 routes do not break a v6-only connection -- either > > filter out and warn about v4 routes via the tun interface or just let > > them fail with a warning but proceed with the rest of the tasks. > > Setting v4 routes via other adapters should work > > Do you think it makes sense to install other v4 routes (i.e. routes > using the LAN gateway as next-hop) even though we have no IPv4 on tun? > It feels like they would be totally unrelated. > Gert? what do you think?
For whatever reason I never understood we support this... so while
it doesn't make much sense here, breaking it on purpose doesn't make
much sense either.
I'd go with "whatever is less intrusive to implement"
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
