Thanks, Selva. I agree with all of your comments except two, details below:
On August 2, 2018 11:32 AM, Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> > > >NEED-OK:Need 'token-insertion-request' confirmation MSG:Please insert > > your cryptographic token > > > > > > - The management client, if it is a GUI, can flash a dialog > > > > - The management interface client, if it is a GUI, can flash a dialog > > box containing the text after the "MSG:" marker to the user. > > When the user acknowledges the dialog box, > > > > > > - the management client can issue this command: > > > > - the management interface client can issue this command: > > can issue should be "must issue" isn't it? Other examples use "should", which I like better. > > > needok token-insertion-request ok > > > > > > or > > @@ -486,10 +516,10 @@ Example: > > > > >NEED-STR:Need 'name' input MSG:Please specify your name > > > > > > - The management client, if it is a GUI, can flash a dialog > > > > - The management interface client, if it is a GUI, can flash a dialog > > box containing the text after the "MSG:" marker to the user. > > When the user acknowledges the dialog box, > > > > > > - the management client can issue this command: > > > > - the management interface client can issue this command: > > Same here -- clarify that a response must be provided? Same here : ) -- other examples use "should", which I like better. I'll send a v2 incorporating your other comments soon. Best regards, Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
