>> Here it is, against the current master branch.
> 
> Thanks for re-sending.  Unfortunately, it's not complete - it adds
> "remote_end", but never initializes it in the TARGET_FREEBSD branch.
> 
> So it sort of works because it happens to puts 0.0.0.0 (or even random 
> stack data) into "remote_end" which is then used as gateway address...  
> 
> Sun Aug  5 21:01:38 2018 /sbin/ifconfig tun1 10.194.3.14 0.0.0.0 mtu 1500 
> netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> Sun Aug  5 21:01:38 2018 /sbin/route add -net 10.194.3.0 0.0.0.0 -netmask 
> 255.255.255.0
> add net 10.194.3.0: gateway 0.0.0.0
> 
> (Actually, it looks like it could work, but pinging 10.194.3.1 is 
> subsequently failing)
> 
> 
> All other platforms have a
> 
>  remote_end = create_arbitrary_remote( tt );
> 
> in there, to make it look less... accidential.  I assume this just got
> lost on rebasing (blame it on Antonio :-) ).
> 
> Could you send us a v2?  thanks :)
> 
> gert

Sorry about that. I'm on holiday, and doing it with only one eye opened. ;)

Here it is once more...

Cheers,
Adam

Attachment: 0001-Fix-subnet-topology-on-NetBSD.patch
Description: Binary data

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to