Hi, On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 3:38 AM Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 12:44:02PM -0500, selva.n...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> > > > > Openssl docs do not explicitly state these to be macros although they > > are currently defined as such. Use AC_CHECK_DECLS to test for these so > that > > both function and macro forms could be detected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> > > --- > > Though not meant as a fixup for libressl, as a side effect > > this also makes 2.4.5 build with newer libressl versions. > > (built on freebsd 11 using libressl 2.6.4 while testing patch 238) > > Notes: (i) libressl defines only the set functions and neither > > are macros. So get functions will get used from the compat layer. > > So, going through open patches in patchwork I came to this one. > > Reading through the thread, I'm not sure what the final outcome on > the patch and the problem was? LibreSSL seems to be fixed (thanks, > Jeremie :-) ) and if we build with OpenSSL 1.1.0g+, all is good? > > Phrased differently: does anything need to be done with this patch or > should I click on "superceded" in patchwork now? > Agreed, if LibreSSL has got those macros defined now, we should just drop this patch. I'm marking these as superseded. Selva
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
