Hi, Doesn't this mean that if --dev-node is specified, we'll open tapwindows > adapter > with that name even if "--window-driver wintun" is specified? The open may > succeed > but subsequent wintun-specific processing will fail. >
--dev-node is not (yet) supported and open will fail (just re-tested). > If I'm not mistaken wintun device can be opened multiple times, so we'll > never get the > "All wintun adapters on this system...." error. > Well, we get it if wintun driver is not installed :) but yep, open will succeed. Instead, open will succeed here and something else may fail later. > Right after opening we register ring buffers, and that will fail (with a friendly message): ERROR: Failed to register ring buffers: 1247 We should probably make it even more user friendly and write something like "make sure wintun adapter is not in use". Wireguard creates wintun adapter on demand (on connect) and openvpn during installation and then picks the first one found on connect. Maybe that logic could be more clever to not to pick adapter which is currently used by wireguard. I haven't looked yet into running wireguard and openvpn side by side (or multiple openvpn instances with wintun), just tested that wg and openvpn could co-exist without problems on the same machine. -- -Lev
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
