Tests without --enable-dco (full server side test) - passes everything.
Test with --enable-dco but no Kernel support (client side only) - also
passes everything (spurious failure on one of the p2p tests, but that
was likely related to "too many tests running in parallel").
Did not test on a system with DCO kernel support, as we do not have all
bits and pices integrated yet.
I have not tested the "drop packet" case in forward.c (as that needs
a DCO enabled kernel). Putting that on my "test with full DCO!" list
- the code certainly looks good.
Stared at code for a bit (even though it has the ACK).
Not sure I like the call chain ssl.c->dco.c->crypto.c for
init_key_dco_bi() -> key_direction_state_init()... but changing
that would require a bit more ssl.c/crypto.c refactoring.
For the non-DCO cases, the _bi stuff has "key_ctx_update_implicit_iv()"
calls - are these done by the DCO kernel side? Can't find anything
about IVs in the init_key_dco_bi()->... call chain...
Do the calls to "tls_session_update_crypto_params()" really need to
get a "session" parameter passed in now? Since they get c->c2.tls_multi
now, "sesion" is just one pointer deref away... so this might warrant
a cleanup patch later on.
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 6a5612fe82453915755aca945ff4e876a25f582a
Author: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Thu Jul 28 17:20:12 2022 +0200
dco: configure keys in DCO right after generating them
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc>
Acked-by: Arne Schwabe <a...@rfc2549.org>
Message-Id: <20220728152012.18643-...@unstable.cc>
URL:
https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24758.html
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>
--
kind regards,
Gert Doering
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
