On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 5:28 AM Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:

>
> The actual "change to POSIX ways" part of this is fairly trivial
> and easy to understand :-) - though I do wonder why you're using
> an extra variable for block_mask -> sa.sa_mask, and not using
> sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask) - at least on BSD on Linux, both are sigset_t,
> so it should do the same thing in a slightly more direct way.
>

I can't recall any particular reason for having that intermediate variable.
It does look redundant.

Now I wish someone could review 2/2 of this patch-set. That's where further
potential
loss of signal during signal-reset is avoided.

Selva
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to