Hi,

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Thomas Nyberg via Openvpn-devel wrote:
> Full disclosure: I used Claude for a lot of this work including the text
> below. That said, I was very thorough in all the testing I've done here and
> been careful to verify the bugs and was careful to read through the details
> below. But I don't want to pretend like there weren't robots involved...
> 
> 7791f535 ("dco: process messages immediately after read", fixes #919) is in
> master and release/2.7, but not in release/2.6. 2.6.x DCO server deployments
> are still exposed to the underlying bug, and it bites hard at scale. I'd
> like to ask whether you'd consider a release/2.6 backport -- and, since
> it can't be > a straight cherry-pick, what form you'd prefer.

I'm confused.  My release/2.6 git log says

commit e78a8af2f5ce5ef3bbfefc2dc8efeca84027c018
Author: Ralf Lici <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Apr 21 10:49:01 2026 +0200

    dco: backport immediate notification processing on Linux and FreeBSD
    
    Backport the immediate DCO message processing model from commit 7791f53
    ("dco: process messages immediately after read").
...
    Github: OpenVPN/openvpn#900
    Github: OpenVPN/openvpn#918
    Github: OpenVPN/openvpn#931
    Github: fixes OpenVPN/openvpn#919
    Github: closes OpenVPN/openvpn#945

... and this went into 2.6.20 release.

Can you ask claude what it is talking about?

gert


-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to