Hi, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:19:23AM +0200, Christian Stark wrote: > Here the versions on my Synology box: > OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
This is good.
> OpenVPN 2.1.4 i686-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO2] [EPOLL] built on Mar 9 2013
This is a bit old, so you might want to ask them to go to 2.3.x - but
that's more for nice features than for security issues (of which OpenVPN
did not have anything severe - there's the timing oracle which was fixed
in 2.3.1, but that's considered a very theoretical attack).
> And this means that I don't have to worry about openSSL?
> I'm only affected by OpenVPN's own bugs and security issues?
> All right?
Yep.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpw0DM05IOD0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
