Hi Jeff,

On 20/05/14 01:12, Jeff Boyce wrote:
> Apologies, I forgot I am only subscribed to the daily digest, so I am sure
> this response is breaking the threading.  My response to Mathias is posted
> following his comment.
>
>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:54:16 +0200
>> From: Mathias Jeschke <openvpn-us...@0xaffe.de>
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN connection issue
>> To: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Message-ID: <537a7d88.9020...@0xaffe.de>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Am 19.05.14 21:58, schrieb Jeff Boyce:
>>
>>> This makes it appear as if there is a blocking
>>> firewall between my Windows client and the OpenWRT box. Is it possible
>>> that
>>> my DSL provider is blocking this communication? What am I missing, what
>>> additional diagnosis is needed, and what options do I have that might
>>> still
>>> be available to me to connect to an OpenVPN server at my home?
>> Additionally - in case icmp works properly - you could try to find the
>> blocking firewall by using traceroute:
>>
>> $ traceroute -U -p 1194 <FQDN>
>>
>> vs.
>>
>> $ traceroute <FQDN>
>>
>> If port 1194 is being blocked you should not get (icmp) answers from
>> that router.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mathias.
> I ran traceroute both ways as you show above.  This was run with the
> firewall rules in place, which includes a rule for allowing OpenVPN access
> to Port 1194.  The results for both are the same, with the excerpts shown
> below, with my public IP's sanitized.
>
> [root@disect ~]# traceroute <fqdn>
> traceroute to <fqdn> (66.77.88.99), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1  pfgateway.mei.lan (192.168.112.11)  0.151 ms  0.131 ms  0.191 ms
> ... snip ...
> 19  66.77.88.99 (66.77.88.99)  62.059 ms  62.765 ms  57.293 ms
>
> [root@disect ~]# traceroute -U -p 1194 <fqdn>
> traceroute to <fqdn> (66.77.88.99), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1  pfgateway.mei.lan (192.168.112.11)  0.173 ms  0.166 ms  0.155 ms
> ... snip ...
> 19  66.77.88.99 (66.77.88.99)  60.778 ms  64.631 ms  61.087 ms
>
> So with this information and my previous tests, which is correct.
> Traceroute saying that Port 1194 is open, or nmap saying the Port 1194 is
> not open.  I am beginning to think that it is not a firewall issue, and that
> there is something else causing the TLS error.  What other potential things
> might cause the TLS error listed below?
>
> Tue May 06 12:57:14 2014 us=986234 read UDPv4: Connection reset by peer
> (WSAECONNRESET) (code=10054)
> Tue May 06 12:57:44 2014 us=875834 TLS Error: TLS key negotiation failed to
> occur within 60 seconds (check your network connectivity)
> Tue May 06 12:57:44 2014 us=875834 TLS Error: TLS handshake failed
> Tue May 06 12:57:44 2014 us=875834 TCP/UDP: Closing socket
>
can you try switching to
   proto tcp
? If that works then it is most likely a bad switch somewhere; in 99% of 
the cases the above messages are caused by either a firewall misconfig 
(check the firewall settings on the server itself as well) or a cheapo 
home switch that does not handle UDP connections properly.

HTH,

JJK



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to