Please don't reply outside of maillist. Press "reply list" or "reply all" instead of usual "reply".
On 26.09.2015 15:44, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 26/9/2015 2:21 μμ, ValdikSS wrote: > > > Thank you much for your advice! No problem. > > I guess I could rather switch to TCP. I've heard it might also provide better > performance overall. (Is it true?) It depends. Some people say that TCP over TCP is not a very good idea and they probably right, but it should be fine in most times. Make sure to prevent OpenVPN from setting buffer sizes! Add: sndbuf 0 rcvbuf 0 in both server and client configs and you'll probably get the same speed as with UDP. (for more information, see ticket https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/461) > > Would it be enough to change the setting from "proto UDP" to "proto TCP" > (both on server and clients)? Yes. > > Alternatively, is there a way to offer connectivity over both TCP and UDP > server-side, so the client selects the protocol? As far as I know, there is no way to use both TCP and UDP with one daemon. You should run two daemons, one for UDP and one for TCP. They could have the same configuration but only with different proto. > > Any suggestions from literature or experience will be welcome! > > All the best, > Nick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
