On 23/5/2016 11:15 μμ, Selva Nair wrote:

> While this should work, leaving all common options in the config file 
> and the ones that need client-specific override in ccd/DEFAULT may be 
> easier to maintain than using push-reset and redefining all push 
> options. Then all clients without a specific ccd file will get the 
> common options plus those in DEFAULT while the ones with a ccd file 
> would get the common options plus those in the ccd file.

You are undoubtedly right!

Yet, as I am experimenting with these configuration options, I decided 
to try (in an experimental, "beta" stage) this approach, i.e. to 
push-reset and then reconfigure this couple of new clients, leaving the 
rest of the config as is. For a more permanent solution, I am planning 
to use the push-remove option!

>  push-remove in git master is even better.

Yes, of course! I look forward to finding the soonest available time to 
build it!

> In your server config add push "route-gateway 10.12.12.1". This is 
> automatically done (for topology subnet) if --server option is used to 
> setup the server ip, ip-pool etc, not otherwise. Also see --server and 
> --route options in the man page for more details.

Thank you, I will try that.  But: in my server config I do have: "server 
10.12.12.0 255.255.255.0" (as I have earlier listed). Wouldn't this be 
the same as defining the --server option to setup the server ip?

Thanks again!
Nick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to