Hi,

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:50:28PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Same I said would apply to packets coming in: when going from OpenVPN to tun0
> they would not be subject to routing/iptables.

Huh?  Of course everything OpenVPN sends towards the host is seen
as "INPUT on tun0" by the firewalls, and by the routing.

> Basically the idea is that OpenVPN and the tun0 interface are directly 
> attached,
> so I/O between the two is direct.

While they are directly attached, there is full blast iptables inbound
and outbound on the tun0 side.

So it's actually *better* to imagine "the OpenVPN server" to be a black
box connected to a second network card of the "Linux server", named "tun0"
(and that actually explains routing/filtering/iroute-vs-route quite well).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to