On jeu. 9 nov. 01:07:24 2017, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > I would have expected 2.4.4 client+server to be faster.... > Other than that, can you try running iperf / iperf3 using > iperf -c ... -n 200M -r -fk > > and see if the numbers become more "stable". I have often seen that running > "just iperf" will produce wildly varying results, both on Ethernet and VPN > links.
Hi, I with this options, I have 94M outside of the VPN and 87.8M inside with a 2.3.4 server and a 2.4.3 client. So, it looks like pretty the same than without the options. -- alarig
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
