On 18/12/18 08:40, Tamir Khason wrote:
VPN server is server

TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  4] local 10.8.0.1 port 5001 connected with 10.8.0.2 port 43132
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-11.0 sec  1.64 MBytes  1.25 Mbits/sec
[  4] local *.*.*.* port 5001 connected with *.*.*.* port 47572
[  4]  0.0-16.0 sec  2.61 MBytes  1.37 Mbits/sec

VPN client is server

TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  4] local 10.8.0.2 port 5001 connected with 10.8.0.1 port 54758
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-10.4 sec  6.00 MBytes  4.84 Mbits/sec

As for the system performance
real    0m10.569s
user    0m7.482s
sys     0m0.017s


So it does look like the VPN is the bottleneck - although you are seeing numbers here that are even less than your original report. The tricky thing about iperf is that it measures a "push", and not a "pull", i.e when the VPN client is the iperf *server* you measure the download speed to the client. Still. 4.84 Mbps is far less than the 8-10 Mbps you said earlier.

It would also be interesting to see if there is any packet loss during/after the transfer - what does 'ifconfig tun0' show ? Can you do the same measurement *outside* of the tunnel (i.e. public IP to public IP) ?

HTH,

JJK



_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to