Hi, On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:46:13AM +0000, Leroy Tennison via Openvpn-users wrote: > I have also tried having two clients to the same OpenVPN server providing the > same routes and have found that "the last will be first" - the OpenVPN status > log showed the latter connections replacing the former connection's routes. > In that case the second system was a backup without full access to its local > subnets with the result being predictably undesirable.
In "real" networks I usually solve this with more-specific routes - that
is, the primary connection is routed
192.168.10.0/25
192.168.10.128/25
and the backup connection is routed
192.168.10.0/24
so when both are connected, there is clear preference to the primary link.
Now, I have no idea whether OpenVPN's iroute code will actually get this
right. Worth a test.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
