Hi Aleksandar,

On 01/12/21 20:23, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote:

On 1. Dec 2021, at 18:48, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:

You might have hit that subnet in the pool, and then decided "I want to
make it static", picking the same subnet for ccd/
Yes, that’s exactly what happened, but I’ve just checked the revision control 
and it was back in 2009!
There must be something that prevents clashes, or at least hands out the IPs 
from the pool differently
so that .5 never gets handed out, no one can be that lucky for that long ;)

Anyway, thanks for the confirmation, I’ve shrank the pool and assigned static 
IPs outside of the pool and all is well.



as extra information:  with the old-style net30 pool a client is normally never handed the .5 address, but the .6 address:
   inet 10.200.0.10 peer 10.200.0.9/32 scope global noprefixroute tun0

the remote endpoint address is never pingable so perhaps you got extra lucky this way...

HTH,

JJK






_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to