On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi Gurkan! >> >> You talked about doing a milestone release in the next days. >> >> Just like to make sure that we've finally met all prerequisites before you >> start the vote. > > > Thanks for the discussion Mark... > > The normal process would be: > > * release discussion - describing proposed release plans (e.g. approximate > timing, remaining functional items, etc). This gives community members a > chance to comment, register additional function/bug fixes that they'd like > to see included, etc. > > * release preparation - once consensus is reached, prepare for the release. > Finalize desired functionality, prepare documentation, etc. Good time to ask > community members to review (easier to fix now, rather than spinning a new > release candidate, starting a new vote, etc...) > > * release vote - prepare a release for review and call a vote. > > In incubator, we'll then go through an incubator vote. We should expect that > this incubator vote will identify problems. But that's all goodness... Once > the incubator vote passes, then we have our first release.
+1 when Trinidad was still in the incubator mode, the folks on the [email protected] list really helped to polish some of the (maven) artifacts. The Trinidad project is still gaining from that. All good stuff there. But don't expect the first vote to pass ;-) -Matthias > > --kevan > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
