Hi Gurkan... I noticed that from the SCM mails :-). I will check the mails for any other required items.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mohammad; > > I attacked the two of them in the late night :) > > 1* I added the *licences* directory for binary distribution of the project. > You can reach all the distribution related stuffs under the */distribution* > directory. > 2* I changed the artifact names of the *webbeans-api* and *webbeans-impl* to > *openwebbeans-api* and *openwebbeans-impl* > > Its great that you can start any other items. > > Thanks a lot; > > /Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12:13 PM > Subject: Re: M1- Release Content > > Hi Gurkan... > > If you are not already started to work on these issues, I will start > working on them tomorrow. > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> >>> Hi; >>> >>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the >>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the >>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management >>> tasks. >>> >>> M1 release will support the following items; >>> >>> * Simple WebBeans Support >>> * Producer Method Support >>> * Event and Observer Support >>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support >>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support >>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support >>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface) >>> >>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this >>> release are the following items; >>> >>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support >>> * JMS WebBeans Support >>> * Producer Field Support >>> * Servlet Injection Support >>> * Inheritance and Realization Support >>> * Common Annotations Support >>> * Full Support for Validation Checks >>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations >>> * Full Support for XML Configuration >>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI) >>> >>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ? >>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it >>> to another date for adding more functionality ? >>> ? What is your further comments and advices? >> >> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release. >> >> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some >> comments... >> >> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd >> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE >> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See -- >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no >> COPYRIGHT) >> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does >> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g. >> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced). >> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The >> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses >> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are >> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either >> way. >> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and >> META-INF/NOTICE files >> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar" >> >> Enough for tonight... >> >> --kevan >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > ---- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein > > > > -- ---- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
